Times, a slight approximation to the theory of time. From Sarmiento and Koselleck

Abstract

Going through a comparative bibliographic review between Sarmiento and Koselleck, the history of time, time in history and the history-time relationship nuanced from the scientific approach (a natural time) and from the historiographic (historical time) is a task extremely interesting in which the historian must repair. Starting from knowing time as a narrative construction capable of being theorized and deconstructed, to know how different times are, their conceptions and the implications that come with them allows us to see in time the quintessential object-phenomenon of modernity, a modernity based on the Nation-State as administrator of an abstract time that subjects subjects and collectivities to mechanical rhythms of production and consumption of values, capital and merchandise.

Visor XML-JATS (Spanish)
PDF | (Spanish)
EPUB | (Spanish)
HTML | (Spanish)

References

Ankersmit, F. (2010) La experiencia histórica sublime. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.

Huizinga, J. (1996) Homo ludens. Madrid: Alianza Editorial-Emecé.

Koselleck, R. (1993) Futuro pasado. Para una semántica de los tiempos históricos. España: Ediciones Paidós.

Sarmiento, A. (1991) El fantasma cuyo andar deja huella. La evolución del tiempo. México: FCE-CONACYT-SEP.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.